·
Last changedVersion:
No hardening report available.
Turn engineering work into evidence-backed impact statements for performance reviews, self-reviews, promotion packets, and weekly updates. Uniquely mines Copilot CLI session logs, git history, and PRs to reconstruct forgotten work.
USE FOR: "brag", "log work", "what did I do", "backfill", "performance review", "self-review", "promo packet", "weekly update", "status report", "write impact statement", "what did I ship", "I forgot to log my work", "review prep", "accomplishments" DO NOT USE FOR: project management, sprint planning, time tracking, ticket creation
| User wants... | Mode | Output |
|---|---|---|
Log one accomplishment | Capture | 1 impact-first entry |
"What did I do last week?" | Backfill | Entries grouped by week, mined from git/PRs/sessions |
Prep for review or promo | Review Pack | Entries grouped by impact theme + STAR narratives |
save_to_brag_sheet, git, gh) before choosing a workflow.(evidence needed) — never silently omit.save_to_brag_sheet or any write tool until the user has explicitly confirmed the entries in the current turn. A prior general instruction ("yes, save everything") does not count — require per-batch confirmation.Every entry uses impact-first framing with three required parts:
Do not output an entry unless it includes all three parts. If evidence is missing, ask for it or mark as "(evidence needed)".
| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do instead |
|---|---|
"Fixed a bug in auth" | "Fixed token refresh race condition → eliminated 401s affecting 12% of API calls → PR #247" |
"Worked on dashboards" | "Built latency dashboard in Grafana → on-call detects P95 spikes in <2min → deployed to prod" |
Invent a metric: "saved 40% of eng time" | Ask: "Do you have a rough estimate, or should I keep this qualitative?" |
One entry per commit | Group related commits into one entry with highest-impact framing |
Passive voice: "The pipeline was improved" | Active voice: "Built CI matrix → caught Windows-only bug before release" |
List technologies used | State the outcome: "Migrated 4 services to IaC → deploy time 45min → 8min" |
Silently drop weak entries | Mark |
Not every entry needs a metric. Use the strongest evidence available:
| Strength | Evidence type | Example |
|---|---|---|
🥇 Best | Quantified metric | "Reduced P95 latency from 800ms to 120ms" |
🥈 Strong | PR, commit, or doc link | "PR #312, design doc in wiki" |
🥉 Good | Observable outcome | "Unblocked Team X", "Resolved Sev2 incident Y" |
✅ Acceptable | Qualitative + context | "Reduced toil for on-call rotation — see updated runbook" |
⚠️ Weak | Activity only | "Worked on auth" — reframe or mark |
Never invent a metric to fill the gap. Qualitative evidence with context beats fabricated numbers.
| ID | Emoji | Use for |
|---|---|---|
| 🚀 | Merged PRs, shipped features |
| 🐛 | Bug fixes, incident patches |
| 🏗️ | Infra, deployments, migrations |
| 🔍 | Root cause analysis, debugging |
| 🤝 | Reviews, mentoring, design discussions |
| 🔧 | Dev tools, scripts, automation |
| 🚨 | Incident response, on-call wins |
| 📐 | Design docs, architecture decisions |
| 📝 | Docs, runbooks, guides |
Follow this decision tree:
If save_to_brag_sheet tool is available → use extension tools directly (save_to_brag_sheet, review_brag_sheet, generate_work_log). Do not reference or attempt to call these tools unless they are confirmed available.
save_to_brag_sheet, display the entry and ask: "Save this entry? (yes/no)". Do not batch-save without explicit per-batch approval from the user in the current turn.If git or gh CLI is available → backfill from commits and PRs (see Backfill section below)
Otherwise → guided interview: "What did you work on?", "Who benefited?", "What's the evidence?"
For each entry, walk through: What (the deliverable) → Why (who benefits) → Evidence (PR, metric, link). Output formatted markdown the user can paste into a review doc.
When the user asks "what did I do last week" or "backfill my history":
Follow these steps in order. Do not draft entries until scanning is complete.
Check what's available, then mine each source:
Use ReadFile to check for workspace YAML files at:
~/.copilot/session-state/<session-id>/workspace.yaml
If no files are found at that path, treat as "no session history" and proceed.
Git commits — recent commits by the user in the current repo:
PR history — merged PRs across repos:
Copilot session history (unique to this skill):
~/.copilot/session-state/<session-id>/workspace.yamlsummary, cwd, repository, branchsummary fieldIf none of these sources are available, fall back to the guided interview.
Cluster related signals into one entry:
Write impact-first entries for each group. Assign categories.
Show all drafted entries to the user. Adjust based on feedback.
Format as markdown grouped by week:
When the user is preparing for a performance review (Connect, annual review, etc.):
| ✅ Strong | ❌ Weak |
|---|---|
Outcome-first, quantified | Activity list ("worked on X") |
Tied to customer/team impact | No beneficiary mentioned |
Includes evidence (PR, metric) | No measurable result |
Shows ownership or leadership | Pure task completion |
For longer narrative sections, use STAR: Situation → Task → Action → Result.
For Microsoft employees using the Connect preset, frame entries around Core Priorities: delivering results, customer obsession, teamwork, and growth mindset.
Before finishing, ensure:
(evidence needed) if missing)The user may work across multiple repos. Before concluding there's nothing to backfill:
gh pr list --author @me --state merged for cross-repo PRsPerformance reviews often cover 6–12 months. Explicitly set the date range:
PR history (gh pr list --state merged) is more reliable for long time ranges than commit logs.
Not every entry needs a number. See the Evidence Ladder above. Acceptable evidence includes PR links, "unblocked Team X", or qualitative outcomes with context. Never invent a metric to fill the gap.
~/.copilot/session-state/ only exists if the user has run Copilot CLI sessions. Don't error — silently skip and note: "No Copilot session history found; scanning git and PRs only."
The user might say "brag about this feature to my team" (a launch announcement, not a work entry). Confirm intent if ambiguous.
If multiple authors appear on the same commits, ask: "Should I credit this as your work, shared work, or skip it?"
For automatic background tracking of every Copilot CLI session (files edited, PRs created, git actions), you can install the community copilot-brag-sheet extension.
Install by pinning to a specific release tag (do not install from the default branch):
After installing, verify the correct version is active:
Need this version hardened?
Bring Chainguard's hardening pipeline to your first-party skills — custom rulesets, automated remediation, full audit trail.
—
—
MIT
HARDENING.md
LICENSE
SKILL.md